bradhig
Registered User
Registered User
Posts: 121
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 12:43 am

St. Louis County testing dead spots.

Wed Jan 11, 2012 5:44 pm

http://www.fox2now.com/videobeta/c10d97 ... Dead-Spots

Already they are having problems with the new 2900s.

User avatar
bmeiser
Registered User
Registered User
Posts: 453
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 7:11 pm
YouTube Username: squiddy7863
Location: Indianapolis
Contact: YouTube

Wed Jan 11, 2012 6:58 pm

At least they're being thorough about this instead of just installing them and being done. I don't feel like Indianapolis was this thorough when they installed their new system of 2001's. We have quite a few coverage gaps.

uncommonsense

Re: St. Louis County testing dead spots.

Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:12 pm

bradhig wrote:
Already they are having problems with the new 2900s.
Agreed with bmeiser. Its not that the sirens are broken. Its that a computer just can't predict to 100% accuracy how houses, terrain, and the hussle-bussle of a metropolitan area is going to affect sound dispersion of the units.

Or how people are going to react when a siren that was next to their house is no longer there :P

This shows an amount of responsibility on the part of the County that I've come to expect and shows how much they really do care about doing this right the first time.

federalsignal3001
Registered User
Registered User
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 9:34 pm
Location: Pittsfield Township, Mi

Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:21 am

along with the possobility of unaccounted factors in computer simulations as uncommonsense mentioned, electronic sirens are typically higher pitched and a few decibles quieter then mechanical sirens, and as a result don't carry as far as mechanical sirens, whch might be a slight factor in this. Although not the problem in this case, I think it's worth noting electronic sirens don't have as distinct of a tone as mechanicals either.

uncommonsense

Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:36 am

federalsignal3001 wrote:along with the possobility of unaccounted factors in computer simulations as uncommonsense mentioned, electronic sirens are typically higher pitched and a few decibles quieter then mechanical sirens, and as a result don't carry as far as mechanical sirens, whch might be a slight factor in this. Although not the problem in this case, I think it's worth noting electronic sirens don't have as distinct of a tone as mechanicals either.
Which is totally flawed logic in this case since this is over a hundred Whelens replacing over a hundred Whelens aside from a few cases of T-Bolts and 2T22s.

Modern Whelens operate at 560 hz in alert. Not too much more high pitched than the Eclipse, for example, which operates in alert at 525 hz (source: Eclipse manual). And the 1982 Whelens (the majority of the system) operated at over 700 hz. Again, flawed logic in that argument.

The 2910 is rated at 129 db at 100'. The db rating isn't the problem. Its not that they're quieter. Its comparative attenuation, which you eluded to as a "slight factor." It would be a significant factor if we were going from mechanicals to electronics. But that's simply not the case in STL County in an extreme number of cases.

FedTB
Registered User
Registered User
Posts: 451
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 4:10 pm
Location: St. Charles County, Mo.

Sat Jan 14, 2012 8:49 pm

From what I understand, some of the sirens will be moved to better facilitate coverage.

The siren at the beginning of the video is actually a City of St. Louis siren. For those that don't know, it's located right along I-64, just east of Hampton Avenue, in Forest Park near the St. Louis Police Department Mounted Patrol barn.

Return to “Main Outdoor Warning Sirens Board”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], ARS-Bot and 28 guests