Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:16 pm
Thank you for clarifying your first post. I did in fact see the video, a couple of times. Something people have to remember is that this is a newscast. They are reporting just what they are told or find out through research. From seeing the news report, it would seem to me that the other siren, the 3016, would be the first to go in the system due to it's age. I believe that the 3016 has been around longer than the Modulator. I can't believe that the parts for the Modulator cannot be found anymore. Personally, I think the news reporters showed the wrong siren (the Modulator) in their report.
As I stated before, where do you think cities get their funding for sirens? The people. An extra $5 is nothing and would definitely give a good start on replacing the system. There are many other programs and taxes that take a lot more than a measily $5. Plus, from the sound of it, this would be a one time deal.
I would also like to add that even the best of sirens will still need maintenance in order to perform correctly. You just can't put a siren up and expect it to work forever, no matter what kind it is. I'm sure some other members of the board would be able to elaborate on the specifics. Without this maintenance, you can expect a siren to fail more quickly and not last as long as it should.
As I stated before, where do you think cities get their funding for sirens? The people. An extra $5 is nothing and would definitely give a good start on replacing the system. There are many other programs and taxes that take a lot more than a measily $5. Plus, from the sound of it, this would be a one time deal.
I would also like to add that even the best of sirens will still need maintenance in order to perform correctly. You just can't put a siren up and expect it to work forever, no matter what kind it is. I'm sure some other members of the board would be able to elaborate on the specifics. Without this maintenance, you can expect a siren to fail more quickly and not last as long as it should.