
EDIT: So remove the fact it is the loudest electronic siren, because it isn't XD
GRRRR! I forogt to remove thatValtonus wrote:1 more thing, the 812 isn't tied with the 4008
Has to be 130 dB. Some were 130 dB some weren't 130 dB. All depends on the speakers drivers.EOWS1212man wrote:Oh, absolutely. It says in that brochure from 1983 that the 408 was 126dB, thats 2dB louder than the 612 is supposed to be. I'd take a guess and say that the 812 was in the 126-128 range.Valtonus wrote:Want to bet money that DB rating is in-accurate?Zarlog wrote: Wow, the 812 was just 3 db shy of a P 50!
What sort of nonsense is that? All these dB rating discrepancies are based on flawed and inconsistent measure. All the dB ratings in the catalog the early EOWS sirens are in are badly exaggerated.Tempest116 wrote:Has to be 130 dB. Some were 130 dB some weren't 130 dB. All depends on the speakers drivers.EOWS1212man wrote:Oh, absolutely. It says in that brochure from 1983 that the 408 was 126dB, thats 2dB louder than the 612 is supposed to be. I'd take a guess and say that the 812 was in the 126-128 range.Valtonus wrote: Want to bet money that DB rating is in-accurate?
Oh ok. Didn't know that. Sorry. That's what I thought. It was a marketing strategy.uncommonsense wrote:What sort of nonsense is that? All these dB rating discrepancies are based on flawed and inconsistent measure. All the dB ratings in the catalog the early EOWS sirens are in are badly exaggerated.Tempest116 wrote:Has to be 130 dB. Some were 130 dB some weren't 130 dB. All depends on the speakers drivers.EOWS1212man wrote:
Oh, absolutely. It says in that brochure from 1983 that the 408 was 126dB, thats 2dB louder than the 612 is supposed to be. I'd take a guess and say that the 812 was in the 126-128 range.
Return to “Main Outdoor Warning Sirens Board”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests