Trey wrote:CJ wrote:Trey wrote:
Lubbock makes really stupid decisions.
Keep in mind everybody, Lubbock
is the town that got hit and heavily damaged from an F-5 tornado back in 1970.
I would have thought they would have learned their lesson, wouldn't you guys think so too?

So they got hit by an F-5, have sirens that are clearly in service and claim they don't. Yeah. That's real smart of them. Texas is right in the middle of tornado alley too, you would expect everywhere to use them.
Some towns just don't seem to understand, or at least their councils / mayors.
Correct!
Lubbock's emergency manager told NewsChannel 11 multiple times over the past few years that Lubbock's old siren system is in "non-working" condition and even the sirens that do work won't cover the newest parts of Lubbock (which is true). Lubbock has grown rapidly on the south and west parts of town in the last few years. Anyways, he is thoroughly convinced that since it would take millions of dollars of taxpayer money, that a Reverse-911 system is the cheapest and most effective way to go in the 21st Century.
Reverse-911 is slow and ineffective from what i've heard. Millions of dollars? For a siren system? Wowowowow, someone's a bit out of their mind. A system of 2001's would be $20k a piece, so for 50 sirens that's only $1m. Yes there is cheaper, and to be honest a system of T-128s would be far better.
Here, an example coverage map for a system of T-135 AC/DCs.
Now i heard they are what, around $28k a piece? $560k for a complete new system, plus activation equipment. They are in tornado alley, surely they could get a grant?
(Having said that, I don't know the acoustics of the area involved, land heights and such. This is just a general idea of what it would take to cover said area with a decent system of sirens.)
~Charlie J.